Thursday, September 29, 2016

Does Trump’s Nomination help with the Divided Government?

  
Most conscientious and relatively competent individuals, regardless of political ideologies, can agree that Donald Trump is an idiot. Although it’s incredibly shocking to see him with such heavy support throughout the Country – really makes you wonder whether the voters in these red states even listen to the words he spews out – it may be exactly what this ideologically divided Government needs, a mutual agreement on hating the GOP nominee. In a time where Congress has grown more polarized, notable Republican politicians have come to an agreement with the Democrats, favoring Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump.

Many retired and incumbent Republican Party members have recently surfaced as to their decisions to vote for the Presidential primaries Democratic nominee. Most notably, George H. W. Bush has been acknowledged for extraordinary rebuke against the Republican Party and his recent decision to vote for Hillary Clinton.[1] Although the justification for why is not explicitly stated, I’m sure we can read between the lines – Trump is a narcissistic sociopath without a conscious, and someone who is aware of this is able to recognize, regardless of party ideology. Other Republicans like Rosario Marín, former U.S. Treasurer under President George W. Bush, has refused to support Trump due to the candidate’s controversial comments about immigrants. New York Rep. Richard Hanna was one of the first Republican in Congress to openly support Clinton. The Congressman rebuked Trump for both his personality and talking points that alienate minority groups, “I found him profoundly offensive and narcissistic but as much as anything, a world-class panderer, anything but a leader.”[2] Moreover, Trump’s Republican endorsers may be confused on why these once Republican politicians are voting for a Democrat, but it shouldn’t be that difficult to understand. These politicians seem to be paying attention to the content of the words coming from the nominees while ignoring the emphasis of political party categories in which their ideology exists. Sounds like what we should have been doing in the first place.

There has never been a more “hated” pair of nominee’s as far as anyone can remember. And although many may not be in complete favor of Hillary Clinton, you can not deny the fact that she is ridiculously more qualified that Donald Trump to be President – and it seems that these prominent figures are now resurfacing as endorsements for Clinton. (Here’s a whole list of them: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/08/09/all-of-the-top-republicans-voting-for-hillary-clinton-instead-of-donald-trump.html).

I try to remain optimistic in that this first Presidential debate, in which Trump opened his giant arsenal of vocabulary words to describe a judge as a very against police judge, will finally add to the accumulated notions of idiocy, bigotry, racism and corruption detected throughout his campaign. One can only hope at this point, that these notable figures go on the offensive and continue to boycott against Trump’s crusade.

This divided government has been a result of the partisanship of both parties. Figures like Paul Ryan have come out recently to speak about the negative effects of a split government – also being the reason why he got the job when John Boehner resigned. However, the ability to see past the party preference may be in the near future. With so many figures not buying into Trump’s campaign (although a whopping amount of voters are), it may help build back ties between Democrats and Republicans. In order for Congress to function efficiently, properly and democratically, both parties need to align, while in all, avoiding the tyranny that would exist if Trump became President. Focus on the policy and the nominee’s agenda, NOT whichever party they belong to.













[1] http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/20/politics/george-hw-bush-hillary-clinton/
[2] http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/09/where-republicans-stand-on-donald-trump-a-cheat-sheet/481449/

2 comments:

  1. This is actually a pretty interesting link of notables who are against Trump. I’m just wondering why the notable others who have publicly stated that they would not endorse Trump hasn’t transitioned into the Polls.

    This may be a tough question to ask, but why do you think Americans are still backing Trump while there are so many politicians and other figures in Washington that have publicly criticized him?

    ReplyDelete
  2. That's the question I was wondering man. I'm assuming it's rhetorical but can't even answer that. It's either because everyone just despises Hillary completely or they like the idea that he is "not a politician."

    Doesn't make sense though...because anyone can be just blurting stuff out like he does.

    ReplyDelete